Analysis
for Ca+2 Content in Water |
The experimental content of this
analysis is a chain of steps.
|
| The accuracy of your final Result will
depend on the accuracy of each step. With very careful work you should introduce an error in each step of less than 1 ppt (parts per thousand). If these errors are small and random, some will probably cancel out others. In any case you final results will be satisfactory However, if there is one large error, it will carry through to your results! Steps 2 as well as Step 3 above carry the highest potential for error. To minimize errors, these measurements are carried out in triplicate or more. In each case, results which deviate greatly from the others can be ignored and the remaining results are averaged. In this way, large errors are eliminated and small random errors cancel out. Step 1 is different. It is done only once. An error in making the
standard, large or small, carries through the remaining work and goes unnoticed. Will such an error make your ppm Ca in the UNKNOWN too high or too low? HOW MANY STEPS WERE THERE? This experiment is described as a sequence of 8 steps. But what about each of those steps? weighing calcium carbonate
pipetting
titrating
For a more detailed analysis of the
effects of Experimental Errors
on |